Alzheimer's Blood Test: Levels Vary by Group, Signal Holds
Topics: Brain & Mind

Jeff's Daily Pick. A blood test is replacing brain scans to spot early Alzheimer's. In 15,612 people on four continents, its levels differed by background, but it tracked brain amyloid the same way.
In the United States, researchers at the Keck School of Medicine of USC analyzed screening data from the AHEAD 3 45 trials, which test lecanemab in people with brain amyloid but no symptoms. The study, published on October 12, 2026 in JAMA Neurology, asked whether a leading Alzheimer's blood marker behaves the same way across racial and ethnic groups. The marker, %p-tau217, is the share of tau protein phosphorylated at position 217 in plasma.
Who was studied
The analysis included 15,612 cognitively unimpaired adults aged 55 to 80, screened from July 2020 to October 2024 at 106 sites in Asia, Australia, Europe and North America. Mean age was 68.4, 63.7% were women and 36.9% carried the APOE e4 gene variant. Blood was measured before medical and cognitive exclusions, and eligible people went on to PET scans of brain amyloid.
What differed and what held
Levels of %p-tau217 were lower in Asian and Black participants than in White participants, and lower in Hispanic than in non Hispanic participants. APOE e4 carriers had higher levels across all groups, and the size of that APOE effect differed by race. The key clinical question is whether the marker still tracks amyloid. Higher %p-tau217 was consistently associated with more amyloid on PET, and that association showed no significant pairwise differences across racial groups. It did differ by ethnicity, as did the link with the PACC5 cognitive score.
What it shows / what it doesn't
- Shows: in a large international screening cohort, %p-tau217 tracked brain amyloid across racial groups.
- Shows: baseline levels differ, so one cut off may not fit everyone equally.
- Doesn't show: the size of the differences in absolute terms in the abstract.
- Doesn't show: how the test predicts future decline; the design is cross sectional.
- Status: peer reviewed study funded in part by the NIH.
The practical implication concerns thresholds. A blood test used to decide who gets a PET scan or enters a prevention trial uses a cut off, and if baseline levels run lower in some groups, a single cut off could under refer them. Earlier p-tau217 research drew mostly on White participants, which makes a dataset this diverse useful for calibrating those thresholds. Our piece on deep sleep and tau explains the tau side of Alzheimer biology.
Sources
Peer reviewed cross sectional studyMolina Henry DP et al. Plasma Phosphorylated Tau 217 Percentage by Race and Ethnicity in Preclinical Alzheimer Disease. JAMA Neurology, October 12, 2026. jamanetwork.com
Keck School of Medicine of USC, Large global study examines Alzheimer's blood biomarker across racial and ethnic groups, October 13, 2026. keck.usc.edu
Get Facts First, every Sunday
One email a week: the 5 facts that mattered in U.S. and French politics, the economy, AI and health, each checked against the original source. No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.
By subscribing you agree to receive the newsletter. See the privacy policy.